NEBOSH IGC April 2025: Solved Question Paper with Detailed Answers

NEBOSH IGC April 2025: Solved Question Paper with Detailed Answers

Introduction

If you're preparing for the NEBOSH IGC exam and looking for model answers for the April 2025 paper, this blog has you covered. Each question is answered with focused key points, structured explanations, and written using the most up-to-date answer techniques. All answers are based on the official exam scenario involving a warehouse incident and safety investigation.

NEBOSH IGC April 2025: Solved Question Paper with Detailed Answers

Scenario Summary (Paraphrased)

In a busy warehouse storing consumer goods, a contractor was hired to replace a fluorescent tube using a mobile elevated work platform (MEWP). A permit-to-work was issued, but safety steps were skipped. No pre-job inspection was conducted. The task began late, and barriers weren’t set up. During the work, the tube slipped and struck the warehouse supervisor, causing a head injury and hospitalization. The accident led to investigations, regulatory action, and a notice to improve the permit-to-work system.

Task 1: Policy Implementation – 10 Marks

Q: Comment on which parts of the organization’s health and safety policy were implemented.

Keywords: Investigation, Conditions, Legal, Consultation, Resources, Compliance, Reporting, Leadership, Awareness, Follow-up

Investigation: A detailed accident investigation was launched immediately after the incident, showing active policy implementation.
Conditions: The organization aims for safe working conditions, evident from the use of PPE and MEWP.
Legal: The accident was reported to the regulator and insurer, fulfilling legal obligations.
Consultation: The health and safety committee was assembled to address safety issues, involving worker representation.
Resources: Budget was allocated to improve the permit-to-work system, reflecting policy support.
Compliance: PTW documentation was used, indicating an attempt to follow procedures, albeit with gaps.
Reporting: The supervisor’s injury was recorded and reported as required.
Leadership: Senior managers accepted responsibility and directed corrective action.
Awareness: Safety signs, PPE rules, and segregated forklift routes were already in place.
Follow-up: A commitment to act on recommendations shows the intent to strengthen the policy.

Get here - Nebosh IGC Book

Task 2: Selecting Contractors – 10 Marks

Q: Comment on why the contractor selection process was inadequate.

Keywords: Selection, Competence, Informal, Supervision, Review, Evaluation, Control, Communication, Documentation, Safety

Selection: Contractor AllJobs was chosen based on a personal relationship, not competence.
Competence: No structured checks on health and safety history or procedures were done.
Informal: The process lacked formal screening and evaluation.
Supervision: The warehouse supervisor relied on verbal assurances without verification.
Review: There was no ongoing performance monitoring of the contractor.
Evaluation: No written evaluation of equipment or worker ability was recorded.
Control: The organization gave full control to AllJobs without oversight.
Communication: There was poor clarity in expectations and roles.
Documentation: No documented contractor approval process or pre-qualification form.
Safety: A proper contractor management system was absent, violating best practices.

Task 3: Level of Accident Investigation – 10 Marks

Q: What level of investigation is appropriate for this accident?

Keywords: Injury, Concussion, Hospital, Cause, Severity, Frequency, Preventable, Risk, Systemic, High

Injury: The supervisor sustained a head injury and lacerations, indicating a serious event.
Concussion: Hospitalization due to unconsciousness makes this a significant case.
Hospital: Three days in hospital classifies it as a reportable and serious injury.
Cause: The falling object was preventable with proper controls.
Severity: Physical injury and potential long-term absence make this critical.
Frequency: Poor safety culture suggests potential for recurrence.
Preventable: Barriers and better preparation could have avoided this.
Risk: There was a foreseeable hazard due to improper execution.
Systemic: The issue reflects gaps in management and supervision.
High: According to HSG245, this requires a high-level investigation.

Task 4a: Why Report the Accident – 5 Marks

Keywords: Regulation, Reportable, Hospital, Unconscious, Obligation

Regulation: Under health and safety law, serious injuries must be reported.
Reportable: The event involved unconsciousness and hospitalization.
Hospital: A stay of three days confirms it exceeds minor injury criteria.
Unconscious: Temporary loss of consciousness classifies it as significant.
Obligation: Employers are legally bound to report to the competent authority.

Task 4b: How to Report – 5 Marks

Keywords: Online, Form, Authority, Details, Timely

Online: Reporting is typically done through an online government portal.
Form: Complete the specific form for workplace injury.
Authority: The report must go to the health and safety enforcement body.
Details: Include names, date, time, injury type, and incident location.
Timely: Submit within the required legal timeframe.

Task 5: Permit-to-Work (PTW) System – 12 Marks

Keywords: Inspection, Barriers, Review, Supervision, Training, Control, Access, Format, Roles, Time, Completion, Awareness

Inspection: No site inspection was done before issuing PTW.
Barriers: Worker B refused to use barriers; no enforcement followed.
Review: PTW form was partially completed with key sections blank.
Supervision: The warehouse supervisor left the contractors unsupervised.
Training: Contractors lacked proper instruction on working safely.
Control: Responsibility was unclear between contractor and employer.
Access: Entry delays indicated poor access control.
Format: The PTW form lacked detailed job-specific risk assessment.
Roles: Worker roles and responsibilities were not clearly assigned.
Time: Work was done during active hours, increasing risk.
Completion: The PTW was not signed off after work was done.
Awareness: No communication about ongoing work to other staff.

Task 6: Prioritizing Safety Issues – 15 Marks

Keywords: PTW, Training, Contractor, Barriers, Emergency, Reporting, Supervision, Planning, Monitoring, Equipment, Induction, PPE, Investigation, Communication, Review

PTW: Redesign the PTW system with proper inspection and sign-off.
Training: Safety training for all workers and contractors.
Contractor: Introduce formal contractor selection criteria.
Barriers: Mandatory use of barriers with monitoring.
Emergency: Review and improve emergency response plans.
Reporting: Improve near-miss and incident reporting procedures.
Supervision: Assign on-site supervisors during contractor work.
Planning: Schedule high-risk work outside operational hours.
Monitoring: Implement checks during high-risk tasks.
Equipment: Regular maintenance and checks of MEWP and tools.
Induction: All visitors and contractors should receive safety inductions.
PPE: Monitor compliance with hard hats and high-vis use.
Investigation: Conduct full root-cause analyses after any incidents.
Communication: Set clear instructions and expectations for tasks.
Review: Regular review of safety systems and audits.

Task 7: Uninsured Costs – 12 Marks

Keywords: Time, Productivity, Investigation, Admin, Training, Image, Delays, Replacement, Legal, Morale, Insurance, Oversight

Time: Work disruptions while dealing with the accident.
Productivity: Supervisor absence caused reduced output.
Investigation: Costs from internal and external reviews.
Admin: Time spent filling reports and meeting regulators.
Training: Retraining staff adds extra expense.
Image: Negative publicity can harm business reputation.
Delays: Late deliveries or missed deadlines.
Replacement: Temporary staff cost more than regulars.
Legal: Additional legal consultation costs.
Morale: Staff confidence and motivation may drop.
Insurance: Premiums may increase after claims.
Oversight: Management time diverted from core work.

Task 8: Administrative Control Measures – 10 Marks

Keywords: Policy, Permit, Inspection, Schedule, Training, Records, Induction, Sign-off, Monitoring, Review

Policy: Strengthen safe work at height policies.
Permit: Redesign the PTW to include checks and approval flow.
Inspection: Mandatory pre-task site inspections.
Schedule: Restrict high-risk work to low-activity periods.
Training: Educate staff and contractors on procedures.
Records: Keep updated MEWP and PPE maintenance logs.
Induction: New staff and contractors must attend inductions.
Sign-off: Ensure PTWs are closed off properly.
Monitoring: Use checklists to oversee high-risk work.
Review: Schedule regular audits and updates of procedures.

Task 9: Human Factors Influencing Worker B – 8 Marks

Keywords: Attitude, Motivation, Stress, Fatigue, Complacency, Training, Risk, Supervision

Attitude: Worker B showed carelessness toward barrier use.
Motivation: Frustration about barrier effort reduced compliance.
Stress: Delay in access caused time pressure.
Fatigue: Early morning work may have reduced alertness.
Complacency: Overconfidence from routine tasks.
Training: May not have been trained for that bulb type.
Risk: Underestimated the risk of object drop.
Supervision: Lack of oversight enabled poor decisions.

Conclusion

This solved paper offers a full breakdown of the NEBOSH IGC April 2025 exam with short, keyword-rich, and scenario-based answers. Use this model as your revision blueprint. Always remember: focus on structure, use key terms, and apply knowledge to the case study.

Disclaimer

The sample answers provided in this blog are for educational purposes only and are intended to serve as a guide and reference for NEBOSH IGC students. These responses are meant to help learners understand the structure, keywords, and approach required under the updated NEBOSH examination format.

We do not promote any form of shortcut, plagiarism, or direct copying of answers. NEBOSH assessments are designed to test an individual's personal understanding of health and safety principles, and every candidate is expected to demonstrate original thought and application based on their own knowledge and experience.

We fully respect NEBOSH’s academic integrity policy and encourage all students to use this content as a hint, not a final answer. For best results, always personalize your responses and apply them to the specific scenario in your exam.